@18==================================================================
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 95 21:54 PDT
From: randy@psg.com (Randy Bush)
To: Pimienta Daniel <pimienta!daniel@redid.org.do>
Cc: Archie_MARSHALL@umail.umd.edu,
    "Laurence I. Press" <lpress@isi.edu>,
    archie_marshall@umail.umd.edu,
    gdt@ns.cr,
    Saul Hahn <shahn@umd5.umd.edu>,
    cieca!mceara@redid.org.do,
    lanfran@vm1.yorku.ca,
    sgoldste@nsf.gov,
    sghuter@psg.com,
    o.crepin-leblond@ic.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Caribbean Networks data in the NSRC server
References: <3069d175.dpimient@pimienta>
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 585

> To: upr2!randy@psg.com (Randy Bush)
> Cc: upr2!Archie_MARSHALL@umail.umd.edu
>   "Laurence I. Press" <upr2!lpress@isi.edu>,
>     upr2!archie_marshall@umail.umd.edu,
>     upr2!gdt@ns.cr,
>     "Saul Hahn" <upr2!shahn@umd5.umd.edu>,
>     cieca!mceara@redid.org.do,
>     upr2!lanfran@vm1.yorku.ca,
>     upr2!sgoldste@nsf.gov,
>     upr2!sghuter@psg.com,
>     upr2!o.crepin-leblond@ic.ac.uk

Any mailer which can deliver to such addresses is in violation of RFC1123
section 5.2.16, and hence is not on the internet per se.  So much for the
form.  The content is not worth comment.
@@18==========================================================================
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 95 21:35:12 EST5EDT
Message-Id: <9509272135.AA11403864@yos.crnet.cr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: "Guy F. de Teramond" <gdt@ns.cr>
Reply-To: <gdt@ns.cr>
X-Sender: <gdt@yos.crnet.cr>
To: sgoldste@nsf.gov
CC: shahn@umd5.umd.edu, lpress@isi.edu, pimienta!daniel@redid.org.do,
        archie_marshall@umail.umd.edu, randy@psg.com, gdt@ns.cr
CC: @ns.cr, shahn@umd5.umd.edu, redint@frmop11.cnusc.fr, lanfran@vm1.yorku.ca
Subject: Re: Pimientas outrageous' statement
X-Mailer: <IMail1 v95.09.09>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Length: 1330

JUST FOR THE RECORD

GdT
__________________________________________________________


>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Tue, 23 Aug 94 12:30:41 EST
>From: Guy F. de Teramond <gdt@prwtos.crnet.cr>
>To: Jeremy Whyte <jmwhyte@uwimona.edu.jm>,
>    Steve Goldstein <goldstein@nsf.gov>
>Cc: Abel Brenes <abrenes@ns.cr>, Archie Marshall
><am146@umail.umd.edu>, 
>    "Robert D. Collet" <rcollet@sprint.net>, Saul Hahn
><shahn@umd5.umd.edu>, 
>    Bobbi Gregory <bobbi@stealth.sprintlink.net>
>Subject: Re: Discussion of routing on Sprint's backbone 

>In reply to:
>>
>>Dear Guy and Abel,
>>
>>It was indeed good to have all three of you here to contribute your 
>>exprience and knowledge in what is a most significant development - 
>>Internet conectivity and JAMNet.

>Dear Jeremy,

>It was great for us to travel to Jamaica, and work with you and 
>Archie. We were impressed by on-site capacity and experience. 

>>
>>I've been following the discussion re: routing at the Sprint backbone 
>>level with keen interest. I'm not sure if the discussion came to a 
>>conclusion as to indicate that the present routing configuration on
the
>>backbone is optimal or not. The following observation from our network
>>illustrates the point of this question.
    ............................
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Jeremy.    
>>