| Date: |
Sat, 23 Sep 1995 20:14:15 Est |
| Reply-To: |
"Pimienta Daniel " <[email protected]> |
| From: |
"Pimienta Daniel " <[email protected]> |
| To: |
"Laurence I. Press" <[email protected]> |
Larry,
>> "Mr John Smith, [email protected], last login 1/4/93"
>Archie -- did your survey include many inactive accounts?
>
>While that might explain part of the difference, there must be more.
>Could there be a systematic difference in the types of accounts or
>usage patterns in the two communities? (I believe Daniel based his
>estimates on traffic generated by "typical" users).
>For example, browsing at a tourismm www server would generate a lot of
>traffic, while email between two researhers would not.
Both networks CUNET and REDID are so far UUCP which means there
is no WWW browsing in the traffic pattern. Only e-mail (including
listservs, ftpmail, and "whatever"mail). I may be wrong, but I think
that CUNET (the same as REDID) have no USENET capability.
>> and still more when hurricanes get closer and UPR decide to
>> close the CUNET and REDID gateway as a "preventive matter" (sic)
>Has there been talk of this?
I recommanded to REDID board to write a very polite letter to UPR
management to make them aware this is not a common practice. It
will take few days...
>> showing a comprehension of what are the NICTs which I find
>What does "NICT" stand for?
New Information and Communication Technologies.
Daniel Pimienta
.