"Laurence I. Press" <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
[email protected],
"Saul Hahn" <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]

> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected],
> "Laurence I. Press" <[email protected]>,
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> "Saul Hahn" <[email protected]>,
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected]

> <Any mailer which can deliver to such addresses is in violation of RFC1123
> <section 5.2.16, and hence is not on the internet per se.
> This is perfectly correct and unfortunate. Nothing to be pride
> of for REDID and his tecnical supporting partners.
>
> Now, there is 148 human beings from the research and NGO community
> of Dominican Rep. making use of communication to and from the Internet
> thanks to this unperfect (and unorthodox) tool

My sympathy to them as they are victims of someone's technical stupidity. Because no one using RFC compliant software can group reply to their mail. Try reading the previous sentence a few time, maybe slowly.

The mail you are allowing on to the internet is non-compliant. Your gateway software needs to clean up the To: and Cc: fields, not just the From:.

> = How many human beings are making use of CUNET? =
Daniel, to be honest and my usual tactless self, I don't give a rat's ass for your little ego games. Have not since '92 when you placed ego above fostering communication in Peru.

My only point was that your mail hack may look nice to you but it is sorely broken and does not work. Take a bit of time from your pathetic ego games and fix it.

Love and kisses,
randy
���

My only point was that your mail hack may look nice to you but it is sorely broken and does not work. Tak
.