On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:37:52 -0500, Taran Rampersad wrote
> As I am pressed for time, my response is in English.
>
> >>This paragraph does not represent the free software that support.
> >>
> >
> >Then you support another thing, not to the movement of free software.
> >
>
> And if Free Software that you advocate does not honor liberty of the
> individual, freedom of the individual - then I will tell you no, I do
> not worship the idol you call Free Software. It is not my intent to
> switch one dictator for another, but this is what you indicate.

you can be a catholic or a mormon

you have the right to choose

you can also believe in a all-religions good, a great arquitect, or
someting like that,

but, if you choose to be a catholic you have not more freedom to be a mormon.

If you support free software you cannot support propietary software. Thats the
whole point. You can say "I cannot use by now another thing, but I know that
this soft is evil, I must change"

You can have a no-preference position, or a weak "free soft preference"
position, or an OSI position but in that case you are not supporting free
software ideas.

-- 
Diego Saravia
dsa@unsa.edu.ar