Hello to all, We are going to require 15 minutes of your time asking you to help us to evaluate the virtual process that has taken us to this Mistica Meeting in December 2004. You know that evaluations have been an integral part of the dynamics of Mistica from its beginning, we learn to make the track (to build the road) when walking... as the Andalusian poet said. We will appreciate it if people who are not members of the Mistica VC also give their evaluation. 1. ¿Are you member of the community? Si - No 2. ¿How did you reach this community? Referred by some other member By visiting the Web site of the VC From something read somewhere else in another web site From something read in any media Another way (please specify): 3. Name 4. E-mail Note: In case you want to remain anonymous, just leave these fields blank in which case answers will be sent to [email protected] without any indication that allows the source to be identified outside that field. The product of this statistical evaluation will be used by the coordination of the project to improve its management in subsequent phases of the project. Invitation 5. ¿How useful was the method that was used to invite to the VC to participate in this stage of the process? NOTE 0 = Null 1 = Very weak 2 = Weak 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Very good 6. ¿Which were the factors that motivated you to participate or not to? 7. Let us know, please, your comments, criticisms and suggestions: Debate 8. ¿You have participated actively (one or more messages) in the discussion process about the Meeting of December 2004? Yes - No 9. ¿You have followed (read) regularly the discussion about the Meeting of December 2004? Yrs - No 10. ¿Which were the factors that motivated you to contribute? 11. ¿Which were the factors that discouraged you from contributing? 12. ¿How appropriate are the documents produced during the debate leading up to the Meeting of December 2004? NOTE 0 = Null 1 = Very weak 2 = Weak 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Very good 13. ¿How useful are documents produced during the debate leading up to the Meeting of December 2004? NOTE 0 = Null 1 = Very weak 2 = Weak 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Very good 14. ¿How appropriate were the contributions of the members of the VC during the debate leading up to the Meeting of December 2004? NOTE 0 = Null 1 = Very weak 2 = Weak 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Very good 15. ¿What value do you place on the contributions of the members of the VC during the debate leading up to the Meeting of December 2004? NOTE 0 = Null 1 = Very weak 2 = Weak 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Very good 16. Put here, please, your comments, criticisms and suggestions: 17. ¿How do you value the work of the moderation in facilitating the debate? NOTE 0 = Null 1 = Very weak 2 = Weak 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Very good 18. ¿How do you value the work of the moderation to focus the debate towards the agreed objectives? NOTE 0 = Null 1 = Very weak 2 = Weak 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Very good The Evaluation 19. Put here, please, your comments, criticisms and suggestions:
