CARDICIS SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

OBJECTIVES

CARDICIS's survey responds to three objectives and is organized based on them:

To make a new evaluation of the first workshop, with a longer time frame for the event, to understand if positive workshop evaluations corresponded more to an affective result rather than to an effective impact. Due to this, questions will focus on the essential aspects and circumstantial elements, tied to the organization of the event, will not be considered. We will also take the opportunity to make an evaluation of the period following the first meeting, as well.
Try a first approach of an impact evaluation, to measure invisible, deeper and lasting effects in the behavior of community members.

The first two sections are aimed at persons who attended the first workshop, and will serve as an indirect feedback for the design of the new workshop, as well as an indirect input to the new workshop.

To build a foundation that serves as an input for the next workshop, both at evaluation level of the initial foundation in regards to the knowledge of the context - (based on the established programming), as well as a collection of expectations and recommendations.

This part is aimed at everyone, first meeting attendees as well as to the entire CARDICIS community, and it will serve as a direct input for the workshop and its design process.

In order to complete the questionnaire, it is necessary to know the original proposal for managing the workshop: Work document (http://cardicis.org/doc_pub/index.php?lan=en) and to have visited the Website (http://cardicis.org).

Qualification Scale
NA: Not applicable
0 Null / without importance / Null
1 Very few / Very little importance / Very Weak
2 Small / Small importance / Weak
3 Some / Some importance / Correct
4 A lot / Very important / Good
5 Great / Essential / Very good

If you do not have enough time, leave out the questions that lead you to think more and try to concentrate on the notes of the qualification scale.

If you want to add a qualitative comment, to clarify your quantitative evaluation on a specific question, you have the space to do it.

With the system provided you can make your selection in different stages without losing your information. It should not take more than 20 minutes to answer this survey completely.

In coherence with this approach the questionnaire contains three sections:

1) Evaluation of Cardicis1 "cold ", one year later
2) Cardicis's impact "behind the curtain"
3) Inputs for the meeting CARDICIS 2